Stewart-Treves syndrome of the lower extremity: case report
Case Report: Oncology: Angiosarcoma

Stewart-Treves syndrome of the lower extremity: case report

Jeremy Armstrong1, Gavin Cardwell2^, Alyson Brinker3

1Department of Aviation Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; 2Department of Aviation Medicine, Naval Hospital Pensacola, Pensacola, FL, USA; 3Department of Dermatology, Naval Hospital Pensacola, Pensacola, FL, USA

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: None; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: None; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: None; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

^ORCID: 0000-0002-0407-2429.

Correspondence to: Jeremy Armstrong, MD. Department of Aviation Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 92134. Email: Jeremy.m.armstrong10.mil@health.mil.

Background: Stewart-Treves syndrome is the development of angiosarcoma in the setting of chronic lymphedema. It is most commonly observed in an upper extremity after radical mastectomy for breast cancer, though it has the ability to present elsewhere under circumstances of lymphedema from alternative etiologies. The exact mechanism of neoplastic transformation in Stewart-Treves syndrome continues to be investigated, but strong research reveals local immunosuppression due to lymphedema as a key role in oncogenesis. It is a highly aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis in most individuals where aggressive surgical treatment is the standard of care which can be curative, though immunotherapy has been an evolving front with mixed results as the targetable antigenic presentation in angiosarcoma has been variable.

Case Description: We present a case of Stewart-Treves syndrome of the lower extremity in a 76-year-old Caucasian female who had a past medical history of multiple comorbidities and chronic lymphedema. The patient presented with necrotic nodules and violaceous papules affecting her lower extremity concerning for malignancy. Biopsy confirmed angiosarcoma and subsequent positron emission tomography revealed extensive metastases to distant organs. In consideration of her poor prognosis and extensive comorbidities, she elected for palliative care and is now deceased.

Conclusions: Early detection is critical to prevent progression of this aggressive neoplasm. Providers need to be aware of concerning findings on examination of a patient with lymphedema. Timely biopsy or referral to dermatology must occur to increase the patient’s potential for remission.

Keywords: Stewart-Treves syndrome; angiosarcoma; lymphedema; case report


Received: 06 June 2022; Accepted: 16 December 2022; Published: 30 December 2022.

doi: 10.21037/amj-22-16


Highlight box

Key findings

• Stewart-Treves syndrome involves a highly aggressive angiosarcoma; timely identification of cutaneous lesions, biopsy, definitive diagnosis, and identification of targetable treatment options are imperative to patient survival.

What is known and what is new?

• Stewart-Treves syndrome occurs in the setting of lymphedema, frequently postmastectomy due to breast carcinoma.

• This report highlights a presentation of Stewart-Treves syndrome in a lower extremity affected by chronic lymphedema and reveals the aggressive nature of the malignancy.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• A unique case of lower extremity Stewart-Treves syndrome is presented to increase awareness of development of malignancy in setting of lymphedema.


Introduction

Stewart-Treves syndrome is the development of angiosarcoma in the setting of chronic lymphedema. A majority of documented cases involve the upper extremity with only few demonstrating its occurrence in the lower extremity (1,2). Stewart-Treves syndrome presents most often in a patient with a history of breast cancer after a radical mastectomy or radiation therapy but can occur in the setting of chronic lymphedema secondary to other causes (2).

We present a case of Stewart-Treves syndrome in the lower extremity of a patient with numerous comorbidities and chronic lymphedema. Identifying concerning skin lesions worthy of biopsy in the setting of chronic lymphedema can be difficult due to the associated skin changes. This case report provides illustrations of the characteristic findings of Stewart-Treves syndrome in the lower extremity. We present the following case in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at https://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/amj-22-16/rc).


Case presentation

A 76-year-old Caucasian female with a history of type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism, hypertension, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and chronic lymphedema presented with non-healing hemorrhagic, necrotic nodules on her left lower extremity (Figure 1A,1B). The patient’s medication list included subcutaneous insulin, levothyroxine, losartan, amlodipine, furosemide, and clopidogrel for her chronic conditions. She was not immunosuppressed, and her human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status was unknown. Upon examination, shotty lymphadenopathy of the left popliteal fossa was appreciated and violaceous subcutaneous papules of the left thigh raised concern for metastasis. Punch biopsies of the left lower extremity necrotic nodules showed multinodular dermal tumors composed of vascular spaces lined by pleomorphic cells with prominent nucleoli and atypical mitotic figures (Figures 2,3). The cells of interest stained positive for CD31, CD34, and FLI1, revealing vascular endothelial origin with Ki-67 staining revealing a 50–60% proliferation index (Figures 4-6). Staining was negative for pancytokeratin, S100, SOX10, and HHV8. These findings were consistent with angiosarcoma and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with Stewart-Treves syndrome.

Figure 1 Clinical images. (A) Bilateral chronic lymphedema with presence of necrotic nodules affecting the left lower extremity as opposed to the right lower extremity. (B) Necrotic nodules and violaceous papules affecting the left lower extremity.
Figure 2 Low power view demonstrates a poorly demarcated nodular tumor with hemorrhage (H&E, ×40).
Figure 3 Highly atypical cells are present with pleiomorphic nuclei, vesicular chromatin, and prominent nucleoli. Mitotic figures are also identified (H&E, ×400).
Figure 4 Tumor cells show nuclear positivity for FLI1, confirming endothelial differentiation (FLI1 immunostaining, ×200).
Figure 5 Strong membranous staining of CD34 by tumor cells, also supporting endothelial origin (CD34 immunostaining, ×200).
Figure 6 Ki-67 demonstrates a 50–60% proliferation index in the tumor (Ki-67 immunostaining, ×200).

Positron emission tomography of the patient revealed inguinal, retroperitoneal, liver, and mediastinal metastases (Figure 7). Next generation sequencing showed no targetable treatment options and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry staining revealed focal positivity in less than 5% of tumor cells suggesting likely no benefit from immunotherapy. After consideration of her extensive comorbidities and poor prognosis, she elected for palliative management. The patient is now deceased.

Figure 7 Positron emission tomography of the patient revealing inguinal, retroperitoneal, liver, and mediastinal metastases.

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was unable to be obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images due to her being deceased prior to the compilation of this manuscript. Efforts were taken by all of the authors to not include any identifiable information regarding the patient within this manuscript.


Discussion

The emergence of angiosarcoma related to a state of chronic lymphedema has been recognized since the initial presentation and description of six cases of lymphangiosarcoma occurring in the setting of lymphedematous limbs postmastectomy by Dr. Fred Stewart and Dr. Norman Treves in 1948. Their case report revealed the emergence of a distinct neoplasm within a chronically edematous limb and highlighted the absence of recurrence of the primary breast carcinoma (3). As the development of angiosarcoma in states of chronic lymphedema has become more recognized, the mechanism of oncogenesis within the edematous state continues to be studied with the exact mechanism yet to be elucidated.

The initial postulation of Stewart and Treves was of a systemic carcinogen which acted as the driver to development of multiple distinct neoplasms (3). This has not been proven, but work utilizing both human studies and animal models has pointed to the lymphedematous state and the subsequent multimodal immunologic cascade as creating an environment of local immunosuppression which likely allows for neoplastic development. Local immune dysfunction in states of chronic lymphedema was first presented in 1960 by Stark et al. with their publishing of findings of skin homografts persisting longer in anatomic areas where lymph nodes had been surgically ablated as compared to the control sites where the lymph nodes were kept intact (4). Further investigation revealed impairment of cell-mediated immunity in the presence of lymphedema as revealed first in 1982 with the work of Ruocco et al. who showed diminished skin reactions in an edematous limb as compared to the unaffected limbs when challenged with common antigens in the lower extremity of a patient with Stewart Treves syndrome (5,6). Subsequent work by Mallon et al. investigated the dysfunction of cell-mediated immunity in women with a limb affected by lymphedema postmastectomy. Thirty-five women took part in the study and were challenged with dinitrochlorobenzene in both edematous and non-edematous limbs to assess the sensitization to the chemical and the elicitation of a contact dermatitis. It was revealed that both the afferent (sensitization) and efferent (elicitation of dermatitis) pathways were decreased in the limbs affected with lymphedema as compared to the non-edematous limbs (7).

Recent research continues to reveal the complex interplay of immune cells in the setting of lymphedema leading to local immune dysfunction. It has been shown that neutrophils, dendritic cells, mature helper T cells, and regulatory T cells are all increased in lymphedematous tissues (8) with additional work by García Nores et al. showcasing the importance in increased regulatory T cells in the area of lymphedema. Their work revealed that increased regulatory T cells leads to dampening of chronic inflammation and decreased humoral immunity by observing decreased antibody production in mice with damaged lymphatics when immunized against a T-cell dependent antigen. Their work additionally revealed that in mice post axillary lymph node dissection, depletion of regulatory T cells leads to increased activation of dendritic cells in tissues distal to the site of lymphatic injury and corresponding increases in populations of dendritic cells and activated T cells within the lymph node closest to the site of injury (9). These immunologic changes within the local area of lymphedema are believed to allow for a state of decreased immunologic surveillance within a concurrent setting of chronic inflammation hallmarked by increased local levels of cytokines, in particular interleukin (IL)-6 expressed by macrophages (10). The presence of chronic inflammation with decreased immune surveillance allows for an environment susceptible to neoplastic change.

An aggressive neoplasm arising from vascular or lymphatic endothelial cells (11), angiosarcoma presents early as a subcutaneous mass and can progress to violaceous nodules or plaques that can ulcerate and bleed. In Stewart-Treves syndrome, these lesions are superimposed on a background of chronic skin changes induced by lymphedema that may include edema, atrophic skin, hyperkeratosis, or changes in skin pigmentation (1,2). The patient in the case described above had skin changes characteristic for lipodermatosclerosis with indurated erythematous plaques on bilateral lower extremities.

Stewart-Treves syndrome is diagnosed through clinical presentation, histology, and immunohistochemical analysis. On histology there are vascular channels that run through dermal collagen with pleomorphic epithelioid tumor cells projecting into the lumen of these vessels. On immunohistochemistry the stains CD31, CD34, FLI-1, von Willebrand factor, and factor VIII may be diagnostically useful (1). The differential diagnosis of Stewart-Treves syndrome includes Kaposi’s sarcoma, metastatic carcinoma, other vascular neoplasms, and pyogenic granuloma.

Overall prognosis is poor as an estimated 20–40% have metastasized at the time of diagnosis (12,13). Patients who elect for palliative care typically only live 5–8 months after diagnosis (2). Aggressive surgical treatment for localized disease is the standard of care and may be curative. Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy have been utilized as adjuvant treatment options in metastatic disease, but their efficacy has yet to be well supported (2,14). The newer advent of immunotherapy has sparked investigation into utilization of programmed death-1 (PD-1) or PD-L1 targeted therapies which has shown promising outcomes with various neoplasms, though their utilization in angiosarcoma has not been well established (11). Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immunotherapy in angiosarcoma, those that have however show the variability in the presence of PD-1 immune cells or PD-L1 tumor cells available for targeting (11,15). An isolated case report by Xu et al. describes a patient with a primary splenic angiosarcoma who was able to obtain a complete remission with combination therapy of PD-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (16). This will continue to be an emerging front of research.


Conclusions

Due to the lack of targeted treatment options, early detection is critical to prevent progression of this aggressive neoplasm. Providers need to be aware of concerning findings on examination of a patient with lymphedema, regardless of the etiology of the lymphedema. Timely biopsy or referral to dermatology must occur to increase the patient’s potential for remission. The utilization of next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry should additionally be considered in order to identify a susceptible target via chemotherapy or immunotherapy.


Acknowledgments

The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

Funding: None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at https://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/amj-22-16/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/amj-22-16/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/amj-22-16/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was unable to be obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images due to her being deceased prior to the compilation of this manuscript. Efforts were taken by all of the authors to not include any identifiable information regarding the patient within this manuscript.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Berebichez-Fridman R, Deutsch YE, Joyal TM, et al. Stewart-Treves Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Oncol 2016;9:205-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma A, Schwartz RA. Stewart-Treves syndrome: pathogenesis and management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:1342-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. STEWART FW. TREVES N. Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema; a report of six cases in elephantiasis chirurgica. Cancer 1948;1:64-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Stark RB, Dwyer EM, De Forest M. Effect of surgical ablation of regional lymph nodes on survival of skin homografts. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;87:140-8.
  5. Ruocco V, Pisani M, Astarita C. Stewart-Trèves syndrome with local deficit of cellular immunity: pathogenic hypothesis. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1982;109:489-92.
  6. Ruocco V, Schwartz RA, Ruocco E. Lymphedema: an immunologically vulnerable site for development of neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:124-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Mallon E, Powell S, Mortimer P, et al. Evidence for altered cell-mediated immunity in postmastectomy lymphoedema. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:928-33.
  8. Zampell JC, Yan A, Elhadad S, et al. CD4(+) cells regulate fibrosis and lymphangiogenesis in response to lymphatic fluid stasis. PLoS One 2012;7:e49940. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. García Nores GD, Ly CL, Savetsky IL, et al. Regulatory T Cells Mediate Local Immunosuppression in Lymphedema. J Invest Dermatol 2018;138:325-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Cuzzone DA, Weitman ES, Albano NJ, et al. IL-6 regulates adipose deposition and homeostasis in lymphedema. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014;306:H1426-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Shimizu A, Kaira K, Okubo Y, et al. Positive PD-L1 Expression Predicts Worse Outcome in Cutaneous Angiosarcoma. J Glob Oncol 2017;3:360-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Buehler D, Rice SR, Moody JS, et al. Angiosarcoma outcomes and prognostic factors: a 25-year single institution experience. Am J Clin Oncol 2014;37:473-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Dossett LA, Harrington M, Cruse CW, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Curr Probl Cancer 2015;39:258-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Abraham JA, Hornicek FJ, Kaufman AM, et al. Treatment and outcome of 82 patients with angiosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1953-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Toulmonde M, Penel N, Adam J, et al. Use of PD-1 Targeting, Macrophage Infiltration, and IDO Pathway Activation in Sarcomas: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:93-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Xu W, Wang K, Gu W, et al. Case Report: Complete Remission With Anti-PD-1 and Anti-VEGF Combined Therapy of a Patient With Metastatic Primary Splenic Angiosarcoma. Front Oncol 2022;12:809068. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/amj-22-16
Cite this article as: Armstrong J, Cardwell G, Brinker A. Stewart-Treves syndrome of the lower extremity: case report. AME Med J 2022;7:39.

Download Citation